Most authors are getting the same amount as you. Only a few spec articles might get higher cash due to some reasons. For example, TEC might publish press releases sometimes. These are tasks are specially assigned for which the authors are given higher cash.
I am not at all satisfied with the way editors are recognizing the members through rewards( credit ). Infact, it's quite discouraging me to contribute in TEC. I still don't understand why these discrepancies are being shown. Could you mention the precise reasons?
For example: The spec based articles written by Sukhdev ji, are getting a minimum of 100 credits. Do you treat the Editors with some priority?
M Suman Kumar
First of all length does matter in the articles. Bigger the article better can be your cash.
Secondly, Sukhdev sir is a highly efficient author whose articles are error free and are of high quality. That is one of the reasons why he gets higher cash that other authors. There is no differentiation between articles of members and Editors, the difference is just based on the quality of articles.
With Best Regards,
Other articles are paid according to the creativity involved, efforts put to produce and the overall value added to the site by the article.
-Number of mistakes in the article as it forces the editors to spend plenty of time correcting them.
-Better usage of writing skills for product features and review about particular product.
-The relevance of the article to techulator.
-Usage of keywords and images.
Thanks & Best Regards,